I will wait to see if there is any discussion here before making a decision on recreating it as a standalone. I am not reverting the merge of Morgase Trakand into this article yet. Considering that both of these are major players in entire sections of Jordan's books, I think it fair that they have their own articles. I do not consider either of these two characters to be 'minor' in the sense that Birgitte or Logain are. can Moridin channel saidin?).Дamn, I remember way too much about those books for someone who hasn't read them in ages and has lost most of my respect for Jordan. Maybe Channeller of the One Power and everyone else though I suppose even that is debatable (e.g. Offhand I can't think of a good breakdown. I can appreciate that the list of characters was getting too big for one page, but why the Light and the Dark? This raises the whole tedious question of who is and who is not a Darkfriend or Black Ajah, for no good reason.

Where should the line be drawn? To concur with Eisnel, we should be careful to avoid fancruft. Adeleas and Vandene? I deliberately did NOT nominate them along with the others because they seemed fairly plot central in at least some of the books.

At what point do 'supporting' characters deserve their own page? IMO Slayer, Logain, Verin and Shaidar Haran deserve their own articles (which 3 of them currently have).

When does a character move from here to being a major character?.

There needs to be some consensus as to the structure of this article. As a result the article is for the moment a bit out of kilter, with Verin having a separate section and the rest of the Aes Sedai lumped together. Over the past week I've moved all the info from the separate 'minor' Aes Sedai articles into this list (in fact I nominated them for deletion and the resultant vote was for a redirect). There are lots of fans out there that will make an article for the tiniest Pokemon character and it gets annoying. to a small number of articles, because it avoids the FanCruft label. I now think that it's a good thing that we combine a lot of characters, places, etc. If, on the other hand, the item is likely to be referred to in several places, making a separate article is good to avoid duplication. Obviously this will depend somewhat on your browser settings, but until you have that much text, there's no point in breaking it out: the resulting article will look stupid and puny.

verilon 16:27, (UTC)ДЄs a rule of thumb, don't break out an item into a separate article on volume alone until it covers at least a page-worth of text.

For example, Emond's Field should have its own article, but other villages in the area should not, simply because Emond's Field is the starting point for everything, but the other villages are only sidesteps along the original journey, and only mentioned here and there throughout the rest. Well, I think that there should be a new article for a character or place depending on how much information can be provided for it and/or how much importance it means to the plot. At what point should some characters, groups, concepts and places be broken out into their own articles? - Eisnel 16:47, (UTC)

Wheel of time slayer